Sie müssen Brand Viagra nur bei derviagra apothekeViagra Brand ist für jene Patienten nicht angezeigt, die eine andere Medizin gegen

Cialis is cheaper than brand pills, and you can always afford normal treatmentcialis onlineCialis online simply place your order, use your credit card to pay for your pillscialistaking erection pills to support your compromised erectile function (you will not have to take Cialis for the rest of your life.There is only one place to play from Online Casinos.casinoPlay Online Slots.Usually the recommended dose is 50 mg Viagra.ViagraViagra 100mg

Inspirational Architecture – 4 – Baum / Cheatham Affordable Infill Prototype

by Chad Ludeman on January 9, 2008 · 4 comments

in Design,inspiration

This inspirational project was completed by architect Edward M Baum and developer Diane Cheatham in Dallas in 2004. As I review the Dwell article detailing the project I am reminded at the similarities to our current project. The project was a prototype for building modern and affordable homes on Dallas’s standard building lots of 50′ x 150′. They were able to fit four, one-story, 1,700 square foot homes on two of these lots and build them for roughly $100 psf using mainly materials sourced from local big box retailers like Home Depot and Lowes.

Dallas Infill Prototype Image
While I have a love/hate relationship with these big box home improvement stores, there is something to be said for designing homes that can be built with materials from them. It allows the homes to not only be built economically, but greaty reduces the difficulty in obtaining the materials for construction. One could argue that with the right plans, a really long weekend of ordering materials at Home Depot and a couple thousand man hours of labor, you could end up with one of these lovely homes or at least something very close to them.

OK, lets talk development again. This team also had the goal of making these affordable, market rate units and ended up selling them within weeks of completion for $275K each. That’s pretty not bad and quite admirable in my humble opinion. The article says they bought each lot for about $80K so that means that a sale price of $275K – $40K in land costs – $170K in construction costs leaves them with about $65K to cover their soft costs, financing costs and leave them with some cash to pay their bills and put food on the table for their families and possibly some close friends.

Let’s look at their potential profit in a bit more detail. They need financing and we’ll estimate that they paid roughly $15K for each home in loan fees and interest. This is fairly conservative if the project takes 12 months from time of closing to selling the homes. They need to pay their realtor 5% or so which takes another $14K from their pockets. We’ll estimate that they got a good deal from their other professionals and paid another $11K or so in architect, engineering and miscellaneous fees per home. This could be much more but I am just guessing. That gives us an estimated profit of $25K per home.

Why are we looking at their estimated financials in such detail? A couple reasons:

  1. To show that their profit is not $105K per house ($275K – $170K).
  2. To show that they could choose to add $20K – $40K more in high end finishes and fixtures and command 50% more for their homes to increase profitability but they choose not to.
  3. To show that making $100K every two years or so on a project that makes one proud while providing quality architecture and construction to a lower level of the market than the upper middle class is not a bad living. It’s not a fortune but it beats starving or selling your soul to corporate America (feel free to substitute your personal extremes here. These are just mine…).

Enough words. Let’s see some more pics!

Baum House plans
modern carport
modern kitchen living room
Interior and courtyard view
modern courtyard

Special thanks to Steve Segal for reminding me of this project.

If you enjoyed reading this post I can promise you'll love our new writing over at Postgreen Homes. Yeah, we know that's the same thing your favorite band said and their new album is nowhere near as good as their early stuff, but seriously, we are actually still getting better.

There also isn't much conversation to be had here . . . at least not with us. So come on over to the Postgreen Homes Blog and tell us what you think of our new(ish) digs and crazy ideas. We will be sure to tell you what we think of your opinion.

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Kevin Buchanan January 10, 2008 at 12:46 am

From an urban design perspective, those front garages are just awful. The rest of the design is pretty neat.

Those garages, though…yeesh.

2 chad January 10, 2008 at 12:57 am

I am with you and your distaste for garages in urban settings. You have no idea how much flack we have taken for not having garages in our design…

Having said this they did a pretty decent job with a design element that was most likely a necessary evil to make the homes more marketable. The odd thing is that the garages look very much like carports from inside and I’m not sure why they didn’t go with a more minimalist and modern carport in the design.

3 DCH March 13, 2008 at 6:00 pm

I saw this house on HGTV “what’s with that house” last night..I thought what a great concept…I love modern, modern prefab & functional design…This is great & the cost..WOW! great..Now about getting these built in Virginia..I’ll have to work on that…I want to see more of Ed’s work & his students…

4 Ronnie Masterson October 5, 2012 at 4:23 pm

I have visited the house, walk through every room…garage is very delicately articulated and detailed.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: