<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Super Efficient Windows for the Passive Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.100khouse.com/2009/09/11/super-efficient-windows-for-the-passive-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.100khouse.com/2009/09/11/super-efficient-windows-for-the-passive-project/</link>
	<description>The former home of the 100k Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:21:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gennaro Brooks-Church</title>
		<link>http://www.100khouse.com/2009/09/11/super-efficient-windows-for-the-passive-project/comment-page-1/#comment-4812</link>
		<dc:creator>Gennaro Brooks-Church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.100khouse.com/?p=1307#comment-4812</guid>
		<description>Has anyone looked into just installing two lower cost windows instead of one expensive one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone looked into just installing two lower cost windows instead of one expensive one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenbuildinginDenver.com</title>
		<link>http://www.100khouse.com/2009/09/11/super-efficient-windows-for-the-passive-project/comment-page-1/#comment-4702</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenbuildinginDenver.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 06:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.100khouse.com/?p=1307#comment-4702</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the test for a window company that most of them fail:

If you have unshaded windows on the south side of the building and you&#039;re in a cold place like Philadelphia, you should spec high (.50 or higher) Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC) low e glass on the south elevation.

So my question is, did PHCC recommend it, and was Serious able to provide this preferred glass?   Some window guys call it  &quot;hard coat low e&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the test for a window company that most of them fail:</p>
<p>If you have unshaded windows on the south side of the building and you&#8217;re in a cold place like Philadelphia, you should spec high (.50 or higher) Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC) low e glass on the south elevation.</p>
<p>So my question is, did PHCC recommend it, and was Serious able to provide this preferred glass?   Some window guys call it  &#8220;hard coat low e&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serious Windows - are they all the're cracked up to be? &#124; The Boston Home Team Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.100khouse.com/2009/09/11/super-efficient-windows-for-the-passive-project/comment-page-1/#comment-4666</link>
		<dc:creator>Serious Windows - are they all the're cracked up to be? &#124; The Boston Home Team Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 04:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.100khouse.com/?p=1307#comment-4666</guid>
		<description>[...] clipped from www.100khouse.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] clipped from <a href="http://www.100khouse.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.100khouse.com</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Troast</title>
		<link>http://www.100khouse.com/2009/09/11/super-efficient-windows-for-the-passive-project/comment-page-1/#comment-4649</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Troast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.100khouse.com/?p=1307#comment-4649</guid>
		<description>All--

Very thorough post on Passivhaus windows on Martin Holladay&#039;s Green Building Advisor blog yesterday: http://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/blogs/dept/musings/passivhaus-windows

PT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All&#8211;</p>
<p>Very thorough post on Passivhaus windows on Martin Holladay&#8217;s Green Building Advisor blog yesterday: <a href="http://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/blogs/dept/musings/passivhaus-windows" rel="nofollow">http://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/blogs/dept/musings/passivhaus-windows</a></p>
<p>PT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akat Kobay</title>
		<link>http://www.100khouse.com/2009/09/11/super-efficient-windows-for-the-passive-project/comment-page-1/#comment-4644</link>
		<dc:creator>Akat Kobay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.100khouse.com/?p=1307#comment-4644</guid>
		<description>Kristopher thank you for details, and thank you Peter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kristopher thank you for details, and thank you Peter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristopher Brill</title>
		<link>http://www.100khouse.com/2009/09/11/super-efficient-windows-for-the-passive-project/comment-page-1/#comment-4608</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristopher Brill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.100khouse.com/?p=1307#comment-4608</guid>
		<description>To All,
      The apearance of the suspended film is very much like the triple glazed.
 The difference is that with Serious your are not adding the extra weight of the third pane which extends the life of the hardware. The 1125 is not a myth and it does exist. The cost of the 1125 is almost 2 times the cost of the 925 series and it is my opinion that you get the biggest bang for your dollar with the 925 series. If you calculated $50.00 per square foot on the 925 series you would not be far off the mark. I am availible to help anyone with questions and will work on projects throughout New England.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To All,<br />
      The apearance of the suspended film is very much like the triple glazed.<br />
 The difference is that with Serious your are not adding the extra weight of the third pane which extends the life of the hardware. The 1125 is not a myth and it does exist. The cost of the 1125 is almost 2 times the cost of the 925 series and it is my opinion that you get the biggest bang for your dollar with the 925 series. If you calculated $50.00 per square foot on the 925 series you would not be far off the mark. I am availible to help anyone with questions and will work on projects throughout New England.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lillian Maurer</title>
		<link>http://www.100khouse.com/2009/09/11/super-efficient-windows-for-the-passive-project/comment-page-1/#comment-4599</link>
		<dc:creator>Lillian Maurer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.100khouse.com/?p=1307#comment-4599</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thinking of using Serious Windows in an upcoming project, but having never seen them in person, I&#039;m curious how visible the film layers are. Does the glazing look differently from traditional triple glazing? Thanks for any info from those of you who have used these windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking of using Serious Windows in an upcoming project, but having never seen them in person, I&#8217;m curious how visible the film layers are. Does the glazing look differently from traditional triple glazing? Thanks for any info from those of you who have used these windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Troast</title>
		<link>http://www.100khouse.com/2009/09/11/super-efficient-windows-for-the-passive-project/comment-page-1/#comment-4595</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Troast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.100khouse.com/?p=1307#comment-4595</guid>
		<description>Akat,

Building Science Corp--the architects/engineers on a deep energy retrofit I&#039;m working on here in Maine have been reluctant to spec the 1125 series--Serious&#039; highest R-value window--because they&#039;ve never actually seen one. Since my prior comment, I&#039;ve been in touch with a Serious dealer here in Maine (http://pinnaclewindowsolutions.net/) and they&#039;ve assured me these are, in fact, in production. Now awaiting the quote (gulp).

PT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Akat,</p>
<p>Building Science Corp&#8211;the architects/engineers on a deep energy retrofit I&#8217;m working on here in Maine have been reluctant to spec the 1125 series&#8211;Serious&#8217; highest R-value window&#8211;because they&#8217;ve never actually seen one. Since my prior comment, I&#8217;ve been in touch with a Serious dealer here in Maine (<a href="http://pinnaclewindowsolutions.net/" rel="nofollow">http://pinnaclewindowsolutions.net/</a>) and they&#8217;ve assured me these are, in fact, in production. Now awaiting the quote (gulp).</p>
<p>PT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akat Kobay</title>
		<link>http://www.100khouse.com/2009/09/11/super-efficient-windows-for-the-passive-project/comment-page-1/#comment-4591</link>
		<dc:creator>Akat Kobay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 05:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.100khouse.com/?p=1307#comment-4591</guid>
		<description>Peter, 
what about 1125 series? Can you inform me please ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter,<br />
what about 1125 series? Can you inform me please ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RitaF</title>
		<link>http://www.100khouse.com/2009/09/11/super-efficient-windows-for-the-passive-project/comment-page-1/#comment-4570</link>
		<dc:creator>RitaF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 21:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.100khouse.com/?p=1307#comment-4570</guid>
		<description>Looks fantastic what&#039;s the cost comparison of the Jeld-Wen windows you used vs the serious windows in the same size?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks fantastic what&#8217;s the cost comparison of the Jeld-Wen windows you used vs the serious windows in the same size?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

